Are Tattoos For Lower Class

It is often said by people in my social circumvolve that people who take numerous tatoos are 'common'. Practise other people believe this to exist the example?
I some ways I hold with them in other I don't.
It is certainly true that certain professions might be reluctant to employ somebody with obvious tattoos.

depends on the tattoos and general style of the person, i suppose.
and equally far as professions are concerned, there can't be any fashion of generalizing really.

i observe small, elegant tattoos nice, but someone whose arm is plastered in markings and foreign alphabets comes off equally slightly daft to be honest but then again, like i said, someone who fronts a moderately popular band or something would wait well-suited with an arm of tattoos, whereas a corporate section head may not.

Nah, not really. The people in your social circle are snobs.

Depends on their location. Those who get tattoos on their face or other highly visible locations are knowingly disadvantaging their employment prospects, so information technology is somewhat indicative of their personality and mental attitude.

There is certainly some ill feeling towards those with tattoos. A case in point is that of Military Wife Choir fellow member, Sam Stevenson. In her case, some people have managed to encounter past the practiced work she has done for charity and instead criticised her heavily tattooed appearance. http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/standa...attoo-jibes.do

The belief that having tattoos means one is 'common' is rubbish. It is just yet some other prejudice.

(Original post by hellejuice91)
It is oft said by people in my social circle that people who take numerous tatoos are 'common'. Do other people believe this to be the case?
I some ways I agree with them in other I don't.
It is certainly true that certain professions might be reluctant to utilize somebody with obvious tattoos.

During work feel I was invited past a trainee solicitor to attend court, when I arrived we waited for a while. Moments later I seen a barrister accept his wig off and role his sleeves, take some change out and purchase a tin can of juice, he had a tattoo on his arm....

People who classify people with particular attributes tend non to Really know which 'grade' they themselves represent.

Honestly

(Original mail service past neurodude)
Nah, non really. The people in your social circle are snobs.

I remember if I owned a police firm and was employing somebody I might be put off a propective employee by obvious tattoos - even more than then if they could exist considered offensive.

They practice make yous look crude, simply I'm non one to judge a book by its comprehend. Although almost people seem to...

The reason my mother never let me become a tattoo.

Yeah.

She looks like she's been round the cake a few times.

I merely don't similar tramp stamps (when women have a tattoo on their lower back).

(Original post by hellejuice91)
I think if I endemic a law firm and was employing somebody I might be put off a propective employee by obvious tattoos - even more and so if they could be considered offensive.

1. The definition of not 'lower grade' is non 'not suitable for hiring as a lawyer'.
2. A huge number of tattoos are not 'obvious'. Very few are 'offensive'.

A tattoo tells you lot null about someone'south personality, its just based on prejudice.

YES! Do you see elegant posh boys having them? No you lot practise not.

(Original post past im and then bookish)
Yes! Do yous come across elegant posh boys having them? No you exercise not.

Have you e'er met an elegant posh boy?

Yep, that'south what I thought.

(Original post by im and then academic)
Yep! Do you see elegant posh boys having them? No yous do not.

As a long time (former-) individual school student I must declare: Elegant Posh Boys have them by the **** load.

Source: https://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1875427

Posted by: brookskeircolty.blogspot.com

Share this post